TANGIBLE PROOF THAT BUGANDA IS UNDER OCCUPATION

Home Forums Meeting Greeting & News Reports Baliranwa / Neighbours TANGIBLE PROOF THAT BUGANDA IS UNDER OCCUPATION

This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Alex Kigongo 3 years ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #18155

    Alex Kigongo
    Participant

    I will try to help out those who say today and try to lie to the ordinary Baganda that Buganda is not under occupation. If it’s not, then who is returning the land titles? How did he get hold of them, why, when? What is that called? Why is everyone saying the Baganda has been duped – again? Why does the MOU state that the Kabaka has to abide by the Ugandan laws? This statement we first meet in the Uganda (Buganda) agreement of 1900 – when the Kabaka was forced to abide by the law’s of the Queen of England or else. This is against our traditions. When Kabaka abides by force or negotiation, so does Buganda. Who ever doesn’t understand this as explained here, forget it.

    #28101

    Alex Kigongo
    Participant

    Nga bakozesa amaanyi ge mmundu nebatuzza mu buwambe nga tukyalowooza nti tuvudde mu bwa babeeru. Kyokka ate kati waliwo abantu nga omwo mwotadde n’Abaganda bennyini abalimba Baganda bannaabwe nti tetuli mu buwambe. Kati ebyaapa byebagaanidde nga batuwaamu bya majenjeeke, ffe twabibawa oba twabibaaziika? Amayumba gebagaanidde twabakkiriza okugabeeramu? Bwebabeera bazimba ku ttaka lyaffe batubuuza?

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed