I will try to help out those who say today and try to lie to the ordinary Baganda that Buganda is not under occupation. If it’s not, then who is returning the land titles? How did he get hold of them, why, when? What is that called? Why is everyone saying the Baganda has been duped – again? Why does the MOU state that the Kabaka has to abide by the Ugandan laws? This statement we first meet in the Uganda (Buganda) agreement of 1900 – when the Kabaka was forced to abide by the law’s of the Queen of England or else. This is against our traditions. When Kabaka abides by force or negotiation, so does Buganda. Who ever doesn’t understand this as explained here, forget it.
Nga bakozesa amaanyi ge mmundu nebatuzza mu buwambe nga tukyalowooza nti tuvudde mu bwa babeeru. Kyokka ate kati waliwo abantu nga omwo mwotadde n’Abaganda bennyini abalimba Baganda bannaabwe nti tetuli mu buwambe. Kati ebyaapa byebagaanidde nga batuwaamu bya majenjeeke, ffe twabibawa oba twabibaaziika? Amayumba gebagaanidde twabakkiriza okugabeeramu? Bwebabeera bazimba ku ttaka lyaffe batubuuza?